McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Medium
Brooks & Wimsatt cite McLuhan
McLuhan and Aristotle 5 (dualisms in 1944)
McLuhan and Aristotle 4 (Synthesis between Plato and Aristotle?)
Malinowski’s “new science” of culture (part 2)
Contesting twofolds in Egypt and Greece
McLuhan’s contributions
Dobbs: McLuhan on how much truth you got
Euclid and effect
McLuhan and Plato 14: “nothing exists in itself”
Gutenberg Quincentenary 1940
The kinetic sense
Quantum considerations
Wheeler and McLuhan
Ear-view mirror
Archimedes
A whole new genus of sciences
McLuhan’s advice to Leary
Ian Hacking and the Toronto School of Communication
Innis or Havelock?
3 types of space
Genitives, times and essential types
Escape from the cul-de-sac
McLuhan and Plato 8½ – Gigantomachia in the
Symposium
McLuhan ABC ad on “friendly teamness”
Havelock in 1940
Wright on matter and spirit in 1917
Havelock in db of classical scholars
McLuhan and Winters 1
Classroom TV (1956)
Connubium of Being 1
Membrane
Illusion and Reality
Innis multiplying Hugo (
PEMS
6)
Hugo on Gutenberg in 1831: the second tower of Babel
‘The Later Innis’ and quantum mechanics
McLuhan reads Innis (
PEMS
1)
Easterbrook on Innis and McLuhan in 1960
McLuhan on media science in 1958
McLuhan & Peterson: competing fundamental myths 1
Taking flight
Jung on “the energetics of the life process”
Dating key terms
Wheel and Axle
The Law of Media 2
McLuhan’s “flush-profile” review of Frye
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli
McLuhan at the crossroads
Ignatov on Maritain on Bergson 2
Ignatov on Maritain on Bergson 1
McLuhan to Skornia 6/7/59: “We can’t assume that we understand media already!”
The medium is the message in 1958
Media definition
Innis and Havelock – 1930 and beyond