McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Friends
Dating key terms (alpha)
Dating key terms (chrono)
Statement on Culture and Technology
Harry Skornia, peace activist
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1965
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1972
McLuhan 1974 letter to Murray Schafer
Frye’s References to McLuhan in Correspondence
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli 2
Maritain on Phelan
McLuhan at the crossroads
The Art of Being Ruled
(de Kerckhove 3)
“A genus of homicidal puppets, sure enough” (de Kerckhove 2)
de Kerckhove’s Digital Transformation 1
The Beginnings of
Gutenberg Galaxy
8
Maelstrom in Ertrog and Yeats
Marshall foresees Zoom
McLuhan to Skornia 6/8/59
McLuhan to Skornia 6/7/59: “We can’t assume that we understand media already!”
McLuhan to Skornia 6/5/59
McLuhan to Skornia 6/4/59
McLuhan to Skornia early June 1959
Present as history, history as present 5/29-59
McLuhan to Skornia 3/14/59
McLuhan on dialogue February 1959
Report on Washington Educational TV conference (May 1958)
McLuhan to Skornia 1/25/59 (Cassirer)
McLuhan to Skornia 1/25/59
Birthpains of the new: “an arduous metamorphosis”
“A medium is the sum total of all its impact”
Chemistry of the interior landscape 2
Und so weiter! (the gap)
From world to worlds
McLuhan on Burroughs
Grammars of the Media
Defending the print medium in 1958
The Beginnings of
Gutenberg Galaxy
7
The
goal
of science 6/25/59
Becker on NDEA Title VII funding
McNamee and Ong remember McLuhan
Assessment of McLuhan
Marshall, Harry and Baudelaire
Defining the Understanding Media project
Charge of the light brigade
Richard Hughes on media and the senses
Chemistry of the interior landscape
McLuhan and Skornia 1957 and 1958
NAEB seminar December 1957
First contact with the NAEB
Shaw & the hurdles of communication
McKeon, Gilson and Rorty
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay (the trivial debate)
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay (what is philosophy?)
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (3)
Eisenstein 4 (1951)
Eisenstein 3 (Balázs)
Eisenstein 1
Culture Without Literacy
‘A Federal Offense!’
“Canadians” as McLuhan mirror
Lewis in McLuhan 3 (‘Nihilism Exposed’)
Bacon in McLuhan 7 (Lewis 2)
Lewis in McLuhan 1 (‘Lemuel in Lilliput’)
Bacon in McLuhan 2 (‘Bacon’s Patristic Inheritance’)
Bacon in McLuhan 1 (Nashe thesis)
On
nisus
Vertical and horizontal times in Saussure and Nevitt
S.D. Neill on Innis and McLuhan
Bradbrook’s
School of Night
and the dynamics of experience
“Food for the mind is like food for the body”
Aesthetic Pattern (singular) in Keats’ Odes
Lodge in
Dalhousie Review
Ransom to Tate and Guerry on McLuhan
Past the vanishing point
Review of Northrop Frye’s
Anatomy of Criticism
Lewis citing Hutton’s
Aretino
on calumny
Statement by Pound signed by McLuhan
Lewis on the fate of the West
Reversal 1
Planet polluto, garbage apocalypse
3 forms of Being in Havelock’s
Crucifixion
Heisenberg on possibility
Bohm on “the wrong turn”
McLuhan Bohm jigsaw pieces
Poetry as circuit control
Charles Cochrane and “problems of time”
Cochrane on “an all-pervasive change in outlook” in Athens
Heinrich Wölfflin and the laws of media
McLuhan on first meeting Innis
Rupert Lodge: Synthesis or Comparison?
What Havelock knew in 1938
McLuhan’s #1 breakthrough
Heinrich Wölfflin
Grant on Innis and Cochrane
Universal abdication of human motive
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Havelock, McLuhan & the history of education
McLuhan reading Havelock’s
Crucifixion
How it is
Eliot on Scylla and Charybdis
Post navigation
←
Older posts