McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Havelock
On the imbalance between physical and social science
Mimesis in
Laws of Media
Multi-space dialogue in Greece
Innis or Havelock?
Havelock in 1940
Havelock in db of classical scholars
Richard Hughes on media and the senses
Planet polluto, garbage apocalypse
3 forms of Being in Havelock’s
Crucifixion
Bohm on “the wrong turn”
Cochrane on “an all-pervasive change in outlook” in Athens
McLuhan on first meeting Innis
What Havelock knew in 1938
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Havelock, McLuhan & the history of education
McLuhan reading Havelock’s
Crucifixion
Vivisection
Bellum-Pax-Bellum
Havelock and the question of ‘water’
“The formula of Virgil’s poetic chemistry”
McLuhan and Plato 15: Poe’s
Maelstrom
and the
Phaedo
The bubble of life in Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Havelock and Innis
Preface to
Eric Havelock and the Toronto School
Innis, McLuhan and “the “power of metamorphosis”
The Toronto school and 3 Plato books
I.A. Richards on Eric Havelock
Parry and Lord in McLuhan
The Journey of Aeneas through the Waste Land
Innis and McLuhan in 1936
Stamps on Havelock and McLuhan
Goody on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Theall on Innis, Havelock and McLuhan
The Road to Xanadu
Golden on Innis and Havelock
Heyer on Innis and Havelock
Carey on Innis and Havelock
Richards and Havelock before 1947
Havelock on the interpretation of
all
epochs
Innis on the pulp and paper industry 1937
Havelock on the ‘oral-literate equation’
Havelock’s ‘Professional Technique of the Sophists’, 1940
Babe on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Sirluck on Innis, Owen and Havelock
Innis and Havelock – 1930 and beyond
Havelock to McLuhan, 1970, and its background
Havelock, Innis and Richards in 1947