McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Topic
Lewis citing Hutton’s
Aretino
on calumny
Lewis on the fate of the West
Planet polluto, garbage apocalypse
The subjugation of the human spirit
Richards’ existential demand
Wakese 1: On the quintessential extraction of language
Heisenberg on ‘an ancient quarrel’
Riezler on ontology
Riezler on the situation of the world
Bohm on “the wrong turn”
Bohm on the spacetimes of consciousness
McLuhan interview on
The City as Classroom
Verbi-Voco-Visual note on the chemistry of experience
Lindberg before and after
Foundations
Cochrane on “an all-pervasive change in outlook” in Athens
John Lindberg
“Perpetuity of collective harmony” as judo
Heinrich Wölfflin and the laws of media
Rupert Lodge: Synthesis or Comparison?
What Havelock knew in 1938
Dialogue and ethics
Project 69: What I Learned On The Project
Tobias Dantzig
Ernst Gombrich
William Ivins
Adolf Hildebrand
Not a mode of being but a mode of processing
The American dream
Universal abdication of human motive
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Havelock, McLuhan & the history of education
McLuhan reading Havelock’s
Crucifixion
How it is
Virtual coinage
The world too much with us
Present depicted 60 years ago
What is the present?
Vatican Council as politics and business
The
spectrum
of forms
2017 foreseen in 1965
When is ‘before’?
The sensory thresholds of our being
Marchand on McLuhan on the Maelstrom
Effects before causes
The humble ditch
The family predicament
Lionizing and de-lionizing McLuhan
Percepts of existence
A sense of reality
Effect before cause in Gilson
The bubble of life in Joyce’s
Portrait
Occultation of human thought
The Gorgon
Monstrosity
Espionage as the total human activity
The hijacked world
The show biz world
Predicting the present 65 years ago
McLuhan on 2017 in 1970
Carpenter on McLuhan’s poetic conversation
Patterson: “no interest in biases of space and time”
Dagwood and the ineradicable roots of our being
McLuhan’s realism 10: Pound on the ideograph
Writing and the Alphabet
in Innis and McLuhan
McLuhan’s realism 9: Where Chesterton Comes In
McLuhan’s realism 8: Chesterton as practical mystic
McLuhan’s realism 7: “training in moral sensibility”
Lewis in 1943: “The Frontiers of Art or the Cultural Melting Pot”
McLuhan’s realism 6: dialectics and erudition not enough
Nef on McLuhan’s proposal
The brother’s tale
Proposal to Robert Hutchins 1947
“The formula of Virgil’s poetic chemistry”
Innis and “the conditions of freedom of thought”
The bubble of life in Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Havelock and Innis
Giedion to Nef: “a young scholar of English literature”
McLuhan and Beckett: Through the vanishing point by way of neither
Innis, McLuhan and “the “power of metamorphosis”
The “magical” essence of communication
Reuel Denney
I.A. Richards on Eric Havelock
Body percept 2
On the frontier everybody is a nobody
Parry and Lord in McLuhan
The Journey of Aeneas through the Waste Land
The “Vacuum of the Self”, the “Abced-minded”
Innis and McLuhan in 1936
The “Vacuum of the Self”
Menippean satire 4
The gigantomachia in Dostoevsky
Ted Carpenter on discovering ‘auditory space’
Relativity in
Catholic Humanism and Modern Letters
Giedion – an “Author’s Note”
Einstein
Schafer —
The Tuning of the World
Preface to
The Mechanical Bride
: “provisional affairs for apprehending reality”
Nihilism in Dostoevsky
Complexity or simplicity, theory or intuition?
Nihilism in Turgenev
Eliot’s ‘From Poe to Valéry’
Post navigation
←
Older posts
Newer posts
→