McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Topic
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1964
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1965
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1966
Patterns of Literary Criticism
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1967
Porter in UT President’s Report 1968
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1969
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1971
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1970
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1972
McLuhan’s “flush-profile” review of Frye
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli 2
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli
The Art of Being Ruled
(de Kerckhove 3)
“A genus of homicidal puppets, sure enough” (de Kerckhove 2)
de Kerckhove’s Digital Transformation 1
Percept and concept 1
Pugen’s time
Ignatov on Maritain on Bergson 2
Marshall foresees Zoom
McLuhan to Skornia 6/7/59: “We can’t assume that we understand media already!”
McLuhan to Skornia 6/4/59
McLuhan to Skornia early June 1959
Media Log II
Report on Washington Educational TV conference (May 1958)
McLuhan to Skornia 1/25/59 (Cassirer)
What is the
basis
of prediction?
McLuhan NAEB presentation 9/23/59
Chemistry of the interior landscape 2
“Understanding is not a point of view”
Und so weiter! (the gap)
From world to worlds
McLuhan on Burroughs
Grammars of the Media
Defending the print medium in 1958
The
goal
of science 6/25/59
Becker on NDEA Title VII funding
Marshall, Harry and Baudelaire
Charge of the light brigade
McLuhan and Father R.C. Williams
Chemistry of the interior landscape
First contact with the NAEB
The McLuhans move to Winnipeg
Herb McLuhan in
Maclean’s
How communicate the presupposition to communication?
Shaw & the hurdles of communication
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay 2 (the trivial debate)
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay 1 (what is philosophy?)
Epoch: Dostoevsky
Bridges of spiritual and mental states
Early McLuhan on film
Beyond the cultural monad
Culture Without Literacy
‘A Federal Offense!’
Lewis in McLuhan 3 (‘Nihilism Exposed’)
Bacon in McLuhan 7 (Lewis 2)
Lewis in McLuhan 1 (‘Lemuel in Lilliput’)
Hayakawa and Alfred Korzybski
Bacon in McLuhan 4 (‘Printing and Social Change’)
The
gigantomachia
in
GG
from Rabelais
Bacon in McLuhan 2 (‘Bacon’s Patristic Inheritance’)
The essential plurality of the forms of being
Verlinde and the aversion to philosophy
Gigantomachia, triangular duel, siamese triplets
Taking Lodge to Cambridge and beyond
McLuhan and Lodge (‘Philosophy and Education’)
Bradbrook’s
School of Night
and the dynamics of experience
McLuhan on “dichotomizing” in 1944
Heine on ‘Plato’ and ‘Aristotle’
McLuhan’s course books
“If it can be done, it must be done.”
The “new level” of art
The Toronto school and Schiller
Lodge, Richards and Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
and nihilism
Breakthrough insight at “the level of essence”
Voegelin and the
question
of “intelligible units”
The medium is the message in 1958
McLuhan and Voegelin 1953
Lewis citing Hutton’s
Aretino
on calumny
Lewis on the fate of the West
Planet polluto, garbage apocalypse
The subjugation of the human spirit
Richards’ existential demand
Wakese 1: On the quintessential extraction of language
Heisenberg on ‘an ancient quarrel’
Riezler on ontology
Riezler on the situation of the world
Bohm on “the wrong turn”
Bohm on the spacetimes of consciousness
McLuhan interview on
The City as Classroom
Verbi-Voco-Visual note on the chemistry of experience
Lindberg before and after
Foundations
Cochrane on “an all-pervasive change in outlook” in Athens
John Lindberg
“Perpetuity of collective harmony” as judo
Heinrich Wölfflin and the laws of media
Rupert Lodge: Synthesis or Comparison?
What Havelock knew in 1938
Dialogue and ethics
Post navigation
←
Older posts
Newer posts
→