McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Influences
Ignatov on Maritain on Bergson 1
Maelstrom in Ertrog and Yeats
McLuhan to Skornia 6/8/59
Psycho-dynamics (the medium is the message)
Birthpains of the new: “an arduous metamorphosis”
What is the
basis
of prediction?
“Understanding is not a point of view”
From world to worlds
McLuhan on Burroughs
Marshall, Harry and Baudelaire
Charge of the light brigade
Richard Hughes on media and the senses
McLuhan on phenomenology in
LOM
McLuhan on phenomenology in 1978
McLuhan in Nova Scotia
Herb McLuhan in
Maclean’s
How communicate the presupposition to communication?
Shaw & the hurdles of communication
Eisenstein 5 (the time of ‘epoch’)
Epoch: Dostoevsky
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (3)
Eisenstein 4 (1951)
Eisenstein 3 (Balázs)
Eisenstein 2 (Zavattini)
Eisenstein 1
Bridges of spiritual and mental states
Early McLuhan on film
Beyond the cultural monad
Bacon in McLuhan 8 (Induction = Metaphor)
Lewis in McLuhan 3 (‘Nihilism Exposed’)
Bacon in McLuhan 7 (Lewis 2)
Lewis in McLuhan 1 (‘Lemuel in Lilliput’)
Wakese 4: Swift’s engine of communicativeness
Bacon in McLuhan 6 (‘Medieval Grammar as the Basis of Bacon’s
Novum Organum
‘)
Bacon in McLuhan 5 (‘Francis Bacon, Ancient or Modern?’)
Bacon in McLuhan 4 (‘Printing and Social Change’)
Bacon in McLuhan 3 (
Gutenberg Galaxy
)
Bacon in McLuhan 2 (‘Bacon’s Patristic Inheritance’)
Bacon in McLuhan 1 (Nashe thesis)
Stewart Robb
The essential plurality of the forms of being
Verlinde: Physics in the Information Age
Gigantomachia, triangular duel, siamese triplets
Lodge in
Dalhousie Review
McLuhan’s 1963
Dalhousie
book review
Lévi-Strauss on method in anthropology
Heine on ‘Plato’ and ‘Aristotle’
Jung on Schiller 2
Jung on Schiller 1
Jung’s
drame intérieur
Reading Schiller (and others)
The Toronto school and Schiller
Lodge, Richards and Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
and nihilism
The times of science
Breakthrough insight at “the level of essence”
Voegelin and the
question
of “intelligible units”
McLuhan and Voegelin 1953
Past the vanishing point
Review of Northrop Frye’s
Anatomy of Criticism
Wakese 3: “A word is a single shot of a process”
Wakese 2: McLuhan on the “potencies” of language
Lodge in W.O. Mitchell’s
Who Has Seen the Wind
McLuhan vs Richards, Transformation vs Transportation
Richards’ existential demand
On the “necessary conjoint” of Platonists and Aristotelians
Wakese 1: On the quintessential extraction of language
Heisenberg on possibility
Heisenberg on ‘an ancient quarrel’
Ontology and physics
Bohm and Hiley on “active information”
Riezler on possibility
Riezler on ontology
Riezler on the situation of the world
Poetry as circuit control
McLuhan on first meeting Innis
McLuhan on ‘effect’ in 1946
“Factual means of avoiding disaster”
Multi-levels of simultaneous presentation
The keyboards of existence
Human being: navigator between worlds
Eliot on Scylla and Charybdis
Blackout
Jung
Archetypes as inherently plural
Vivisection
The
spectrum
of forms
Déjà vu
Marchand on McLuhan on the Maelstrom
Effects before causes
The incomprehensible mechanism
The Maelstrom in Mallarmé’s
Coup de Dés
Effect before cause in Gilson
Echoes of Joyce
The very citadel of civilized awareness
John Watson’s heritage in political economics and communications
Henry Carr
Bellum-Pax-Bellum
The bubble of life in Joyce’s
Portrait
Voices in
Dubliners
and
A Portrait
Post navigation
←
Older posts
Newer posts
→