McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Friends
Innis and “the conditions of freedom of thought”
The bubble of life in Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Havelock and Innis
Vortex atoms in 19th century physics
Giedion on simultaneity
Giedion to Nef: “a young scholar of English literature”
Preface to
Eric Havelock and the Toronto School
Innis, McLuhan and “the “power of metamorphosis”
The “magical” essence of communication
The Toronto school and 3 Plato books
I.A. Richards on Eric Havelock
Body percept 2
Theuth in Plato’s
Philebus
Parry and Lord in McLuhan
The Journey of Aeneas through the Waste Land
Encountering Maritain in 1934
McLuhan and Father Gerald Phelan 1934-1936
Innis and McLuhan in 1936
Stamps on Havelock and McLuhan
Goody on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Theall on Innis, Havelock and McLuhan
The
question
of unity
McLuhan & Williams on discovering ‘auditory space’
Relativity in
Space, Time & Architecture
Space, Time & Architecture
and McLuhan
Ontology and epistemology
Analogy of proper proportionality
Giedion – an “Author’s Note”
Minkowski in Giedion
Different kinds of “acoustic space”
Einstein
Relativity in
The Mechanical Bride
The mosaic in
A Faculty of Interrelations
Schafer —
The Tuning of the World
Sigfried Giedion —
A Faculty of Interrelations
What is
coherence
?
Hayakawa — The Revision of Vision
Relativity and topology
“Deutsch’s interesting pamphlet on communication” 1
Jackson Knight on “the main question”
Coleridge’s
Ancient Mariner
and Poe’s
Maelstrom
The Road to Xanadu
Golden on Innis and Havelock
Heyer on Innis and Havelock
Carey on Innis and Havelock
A “trick of analysis” in the Maelstrom
Innis to McLuhan February 26, 1951
Cleanth Brooks on the
Maelstrom
Richards and Havelock before 1947
Havelock on the interpretation of
all
epochs
Innis on the pulp and paper industry 1937
Havelock on the ‘oral-literate equation’
Havelock’s ‘Professional Technique of the Sophists’, 1940
Babe on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Innis to McLuhan January 12, 1952
Sirluck on Innis, Owen and Havelock
Innis and Havelock – 1930 and beyond
Havelock to McLuhan, 1970, and its background
Havelock, Innis and Richards in 1947
McLuhan’s Topic #1 – “the law of writ”
Autobiography 1944-1946
The Beginnings of
Gutenberg Galaxy
2 – Carothers
McLuhan and Plato 7 – “a poise between”
McLuhan and Plato 6 – Theuth
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (2)
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (1)
Why Science?
Oscar Hijuelos
The ‘Values Discussion Group’ of 1949
Post navigation
Newer posts
→