McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Innis
McLuhan’s contributions
Faculty of Interrelation in Toronto
“Arrest in time” in McLuhan
Easterbrook on Innis
Crump’s
Epyllion
Gutenberg Quincentenary 1940
A whole new genus of sciences
Innis or Havelock?
WSCM 4: Tom Easterbrook
Havelock in 1940
Connubium of Being 1
Centre and margin overview
Illusion and Reality
McLuhan’s “secret societies” problem
Innis on thought and its eclipse (
PEMS
7)
Innis multiplying Hugo (
PEMS
6)
Hugo on Gutenberg in 1831: the second tower of Babel
Innis on limitation (
PEMS
5)
‘The Later Innis’ and quantum mechanics
Innis on the eclipse of truth (
PEMS
4)
Innis on the state of the world in 2021 (
PEMS
3)
Innis on media revolutions (
PEMS
2)
Innis citing Trollope on CV-building
McLuhan reads Innis (
PEMS
1)
Easterbrook on Innis and McLuhan in 1960
Statement on Culture and Technology
“A genus of homicidal puppets, sure enough” (de Kerckhove 2)
de Kerckhove’s Digital Transformation 1
Shaw & the hurdles of communication
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (3)
Eisenstein 4 (1951)
S.D. Neill on Innis and McLuhan
Planet polluto, garbage apocalypse
Bohm on “the wrong turn”
Charles Cochrane and “problems of time”
Cochrane on “an all-pervasive change in outlook” in Athens
McLuhan on first meeting Innis
Rupert Lodge: Synthesis or Comparison?
What Havelock knew in 1938
Grant on Innis and Cochrane
How it is
Vivisection
The very citadel of civilized awareness
Bellum-Pax-Bellum
Patterson on McLuhan’s acquaintance with Innis
Easterbrook to Innis on the “juxtaposition of unlikes”
Writing and the Alphabet
in Innis and McLuhan
McLuhan’s times
The Comparative Method of Rupert Lodge
Nef on McLuhan’s proposal
Innis and “the conditions of freedom of thought”
The bubble of life in Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Havelock and Innis
Preface to
Eric Havelock and the Toronto School
Innis, McLuhan and “the “power of metamorphosis”
The “magical” essence of communication
The Toronto school and 3 Plato books
Theuth in Plato’s
Philebus
Parry and Lord in McLuhan
Innis and McLuhan in 1936
Goody on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Theall on Innis, Havelock and McLuhan
What is
coherence
?
Jackson Knight on “the main question”
Golden on Innis and Havelock
Heyer on Innis and Havelock
Carey on Innis and Havelock
Innis to McLuhan February 26, 1951
Innis on the pulp and paper industry 1937
Havelock on the ‘oral-literate equation’
Babe on Havelock, Innis and McLuhan
Innis to McLuhan January 12, 1952
Sirluck on Innis, Owen and Havelock
Innis and Havelock – 1930 and beyond
Havelock to McLuhan, 1970, and its background
Havelock, Innis and Richards in 1947
McLuhan and Plato 7 – “a poise between”
McLuhan and Plato 6 – Theuth
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (2)
McLuhan to Innis 1951 (1)
Why Science?
The ‘Values Discussion Group’ of 1949