McLuhan's New Sciences
When we push our paradigms back, we get "history"; when we push them forward, we get "science". (Take Today, 15)
Menu
Skip to content
Home
Archive
Author
On the opening of a new domain
McLuhan’s new sciences: “only the authority of knowledge”
Category Archives:
Topic
Easterbrook on Innis and McLuhan in 1960
McLuhan on media science in 1958
Peterson on Eliot’s knot
McLuhan & Peterson: competing fundamental myths 1
Peterson: time or times?
Peterson and the fabled ‘thing in itself’
Yeats on the emotion of multitude
Jordan Peterson on the hero
Jordan Peterson and Marshall McLuhan
Point and circumference in 1939
Nihilism stands at the door
Meaning as an arrow
Medium in
America and Cosmic Man
Taking flight
Jung on
praeceptores mundi
Jung on “the energetics of the life process”
Translating McLuhan to McLuhan
Burroughs on ‘Literary Techniques’
Statement on Culture and Technology
Garbage Apocalypse
Harry Skornia, peace activist
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1963
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1964
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1965
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1966
Patterns of Literary Criticism
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1967
Porter in UT President’s Report 1968
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1969
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1971
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1970
McLuhan in UT President’s Report 1972
McLuhan’s “flush-profile” review of Frye
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli 2
Comments on Elder’s comments on Barilli
The Art of Being Ruled
(de Kerckhove 3)
“A genus of homicidal puppets, sure enough” (de Kerckhove 2)
de Kerckhove’s Digital Transformation 1
Percept and concept 1
Pugen’s time
Ignatov on Maritain on Bergson 2
Marshall foresees Zoom
McLuhan to Skornia 6/7/59: “We can’t assume that we understand media already!”
McLuhan to Skornia 6/4/59
McLuhan to Skornia early June 1959
Media Log II
Report on Washington Educational TV conference (May 1958)
McLuhan to Skornia 1/25/59 (Cassirer)
What is the
basis
of prediction?
McLuhan NAEB presentation 9/23/59
Chemistry of the interior landscape 2
“Understanding is not a point of view”
Und so weiter! (the gap)
From world to worlds
McLuhan on Burroughs
Grammars of the Media
Defending the print medium in 1958
The
goal
of science 6/25/59
Becker on NDEA Title VII funding
Marshall, Harry and Baudelaire
Charge of the light brigade
McLuhan and Father R.C. Williams
Chemistry of the interior landscape
First contact with the NAEB
The McLuhans move to Winnipeg
Herb McLuhan in
Maclean’s
How communicate the presupposition to communication?
Shaw & the hurdles of communication
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay 2 (the trivial debate)
McKeon’s 1935 Trivium essay 1 (what is philosophy?)
Epoch: Dostoevsky
Bridges of spiritual and mental states
Early McLuhan on film
Beyond the cultural monad
Culture Without Literacy
‘A Federal Offense!’
Lewis in McLuhan 3 (‘Nihilism Exposed’)
Bacon in McLuhan 7 (Lewis 2)
Lewis in McLuhan 1 (‘Lemuel in Lilliput’)
Hayakawa and Alfred Korzybski
Bacon in McLuhan 4 (‘Printing and Social Change’)
The
gigantomachia
in
GG
from Rabelais
Bacon in McLuhan 2 (‘Bacon’s Patristic Inheritance’)
The essential plurality of the forms of being
Verlinde and the aversion to philosophy
Gigantomachia, triangular duel, siamese triplets
Taking Lodge to Cambridge and beyond
McLuhan and Lodge (‘Philosophy and Education’)
Bradbrook’s
School of Night
and the dynamics of experience
McLuhan on “dichotomizing” in 1944
Heine on ‘Plato’ and ‘Aristotle’
McLuhan’s course books
“If it can be done, it must be done.”
The “new level” of art
The Toronto school and Schiller
Lodge, Richards and Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
Schiller’s
Aesthetic Letters
and nihilism
Breakthrough insight at “the level of essence”
Voegelin and the
question
of “intelligible units”
The medium is the message in 1958
Post navigation
←
Older posts
Newer posts
→